On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 17:47 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes and that is one which the currently existing
> Barracuda Spamfirewall scored with around 20 and
> grabbed from the backend there for testings
> the plain content i attached as ZIP (what made it to the listg)
> is used for testing by just copy the content to a formmailer or
> in a new plaintext message in TB point directly to the test MX
Given (a) you disabled RBL checks in SA, (b) that sample is a plain
body without any headers, and (c) your method of sending the sample
even hits ALL_TRUSTED, SA still does a pretty decent job in comparison.
The Barracuda appliance you're comparing results to did not have those
disadvantages.
Anyway, changing scores after a successful sa-update are to be expected.
The re-scoring algorithm only uses the default threshold of 5.0, it does
not know the concept of a second "reject" score.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
