On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:10:23 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
Ian> Isn't it a bit odd that SA has rules for all these other Bayes Ian> powered backends? Why not give a bit more weight to its own Bayes Ian> instead, rather than make users forage for other tools that do Ian> essentially the same thing? Matus> are they part of stock 3.4.0? Apparently not. So, I have to rephrase: Isn't it a bit odd to use these external rules? :) Ian> Don't you need non-free software for DCC? Matus> non-free in Debian definition. Matus> (you need own server if you process ofer 100k messages daily, and Matus> license if you have internal checksum database) Matus> you can get the source, build and run in most of cases freely. But that presents difficulties even apart from the religious ones. For instance, it means installing development tools on the target server, or else cross-compiling (and we know how easy that is with average C code). The good news is the bout of spam seems to have calmed down. _Something_ must have been wrong earlier today. The RBLs and Razor and Pyzor all seemed to be out to lunch. Maybe a connectivity problem on my side. > Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!". May I quote this? :-) -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Local Variables: mode:claws-external End:
