Am 29.08.2014 um 02:15 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 29.08.2014 um 02:01 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 01:23 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> Besides, your own reply to my first post to this thread on Mon also
>>>> shows this claim to be false. The output of the command I asked you to
>>>> run clearly shows clear_headers in your config being in effect and a
>>>> rewritten Subject
>>>
>>> i verfied that 20 times in my environment
>>>
>>> removing the line "add_header spam Flag _YESNO_" and no tagging
>>> maybe the combination of spamass-milter and SA but it's fact
>>
>> So far I attributed most of your arguing to being stubborn and
>> opinionated. Not any longer.
>>
>> Now you're outright lying
> 
> look at the attached zp-archive and both messages
> produced with the same content before you pretend
> others lying damned - to make it easier i even
> added a config-diff
> 
> * current config with the header
> * frommailer with the SA machine as destination
> * spam content
> * click send
> * fine [SPAM] in the subject
> * remove "add_header spam Flag _YESNO_" from the config
> * reload SA
> * press send again in the webform
> * no [SPAM] in the subject
> 
> and now what?
> 
> maybe you should accept that even new users are
> no idiots and know what they are talking about

and here you have the damend logs even containing the original subject
of postfix's header_checks - so don't call others names before you
have a matching test setup and can *prove* what you claim

Aug 29 02:08:24 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[23354]: connect from 
testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]
Aug 29 02:08:24 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[23354]: 3hkh3X2YJNz1w: 
client=testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]
Aug 29 02:08:24 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[24041]: 3hkh3X2YJNz1w: info: header 
Subject: Test from
testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]; from=<postmas...@testserver.rhsoft.net> 
to=<ha...@rhsoft.net> proto=ESMTP
helo=<testserver.rhsoft.net>
Aug 29 02:08:24 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[24041]: 3hkh3X2YJNz1w:
message-id=<5d0902b99004e92eccfc834833cfbdf9a2e51f251409270...@testserver.rhsoft.net>
Aug 29 02:08:24 mail-gw spamd[21151]: spamd: processing message
<5d0902b99004e92eccfc834833cfbdf9a2e51f251409270...@testserver.rhsoft.net> for 
sa-milt:189
Aug 29 02:08:25 mail-gw spamd[21151]: spamd: identified spam (5.1/5.0) for 
sa-milt:189 in 1.0 seconds, 4784 bytes.
Aug 29 02:08:25 mail-gw spamd[21151]: spamd: result: Y 5 -
ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW_MONEY,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW_MONEY,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,CUST_DNSBL_2,CUST_DNSBL_5,CUST_DNSWL_7,DEAR_SOMETHING,LOTS_OF_MONEY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_MONEY_PERCENT,URG_BIZ
scantime=1.0,size=4784,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=32286,mid=<5d0902b99004e92eccfc834833cfbdf9a2e51f251409270...@testserver.rhsoft.net>,bayes=1.000000,autolearn=disabled
Aug 29 02:08:25 mail-gw postfix/qmgr[22472]: 3hkh3X2YJNz1w: 
from=<postmas...@testserver.rhsoft.net>, size=4597,
nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 29 02:08:25 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[23354]: disconnect from 
testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]
Aug 29 02:08:25 mail-gw postfix/smtp[23363]: 3hkh3X2YJNz1w: 
to=<ha...@rhsoft.net>,
relay=mail.thelounge.net[10.0.0.15]:10027, delay=1.2, delays=1.1/0/0.04/0.02, 
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok:
queued as 3hkh3Y3RF0z23)
Aug 29 02:08:25 mail-gw postfix/qmgr[22472]: 3hkh3X2YJNz1w: removed
Aug 29 02:08:38 mail-gw postfix/anvil[23356]: statistics: max connection rate 
1/1800s for (smtpd:168.100.1.4) at
Aug 29 01:58:38
Aug 29 02:08:38 mail-gw postfix/anvil[23356]: statistics: max connection count 
1 for (smtpd:168.100.1.4) at Aug 29
01:58:38
Aug 29 02:08:38 mail-gw postfix/anvil[23356]: statistics: max recipient rate 
1/1800s for (smtpd:168.100.1.4) at Aug
29 01:58:38
Aug 29 02:08:38 mail-gw postfix/anvil[23356]: statistics: max cache size 3 at 
Aug 29 02:08:24
Aug 29 02:09:40 mail-gw spamd[21068]: spamd: server hit by SIGHUP, restarting
Aug 29 02:09:40 mail-gw spamd[21068]: spamd: server socket closed, type 
IO::Socket::IP
Aug 29 02:09:42 mail-gw spamd[21068]: spamd: server started on IO::Socket::IP 
[127.0.0.1]:10027 (running version 3.4.0)
Aug 29 02:09:42 mail-gw spamd[21068]: spamd: server pid: 21068
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/postscreen[22610]: CONNECT from 
[84.113.92.77]:64250 to [10.0.0.19]:25
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/postscreen[22610]: PASS OLD [84.113.92.77]:64250
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[23354]: connect from 
testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[23354]: 3hkh540hvnz1w: 
client=testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[24086]: 3hkh540hvnz1w: info: header 
Subject: Test from
testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]; from=<postmas...@testserver.rhsoft.net> 
to=<ha...@rhsoft.net> proto=ESMTP
helo=<testserver.rhsoft.net>
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[24086]: 3hkh540hvnz1w:
message-id=<aa9334ef3b057a98dc80f0589a73153957d112ff1409270...@testserver.rhsoft.net>
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw spamd[24069]: spamd: processing message
<aa9334ef3b057a98dc80f0589a73153957d112ff1409270...@testserver.rhsoft.net> for 
sa-milt:189
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw spamd[24069]: spamd: identified spam (5.1/5.0) for 
sa-milt:189 in 0.3 seconds, 4784 bytes.
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw spamd[24069]: spamd: result: Y 5 -
ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW_MONEY,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW_MONEY,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,CUST_DNSBL_2,CUST_DNSBL_5,CUST_DNSWL_7,DEAR_SOMETHING,LOTS_OF_MONEY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_MONEY_PERCENT,URG_BIZ
scantime=0.3,size=4784,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=32291,mid=<aa9334ef3b057a98dc80f0589a73153957d112ff1409270...@testserver.rhsoft.net>,bayes=1.000000,autolearn=disabled
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/qmgr[22472]: 3hkh540hvnz1w: 
from=<postmas...@testserver.rhsoft.net>, size=4616,
nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[23354]: disconnect from 
testserver.rhsoft.net[84.113.92.77]
Aug 29 02:09:44 mail-gw postfix/smtp[23363]: 3hkh540hvnz1w: 
to=<ha...@rhsoft.net>,
relay=mail.thelounge.net[10.0.0.15]:10027, delay=0.42, delays=0.37/0/0.04/0.01, 
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
Ok: queued as 3hkh543Vzsz23)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to