On 09/05/2014 09:16 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 05.09.2014, 21:56, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti: >> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:55 -0400, Justin Edmands wrote: >>> We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and [...] >>> dbg: timing: total 46640 ms >>> BUT, because the live test likely took 46 seconds, I think SA is >>> giving up or something similar. The actual email run through the live >>> SA instance shows no score at all. >> If SA timed out, this would be reflected in your logs. Your guessing >> suggests you did not check logs. >> >> How are you passing messages to SA? Using spamc/d? With spamc the size >> limit of messages it will process is 500 kByte by default. Other methods >> and glue are likely to have a size limit, too. >> >> Odds are, that message simply has not been passed to SA. >> >> > I have 5MB limit with spamc and have not encountered any timeouts. My > spamd server is quite obsolete with only a 64 bit Pentium 4 processor > and 3 gigs of RAM. > > Small load though, not an ESP, but my personal mail for mailing lists > and also my 12 person company uses this as a filter. >
We saw more big spam messages in the last half year, and experimented with increasing max message size (we use spamc). In the end we settled with a 4M limit. Never seen any timeout (or other) issues with larger files, but it didn't matter: there was no significant traffic above that limit. Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
