Hi,
For several months I've been using
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1.0
Any reason you chose -1.0 rather than something a bit closer to 0,
like -0.5 or -0.2? Most of my low-scoring spam is pretty close to 0,
so I'm just wondering.
I know I made the decision years ago to lower it to -1.0 just to be
safe. My ham and spam bayes ratios remain pretty equal.
Really, though, I had no real way to calculate what exactly the right
value it should be other than seeing a sufficient number of nonspam that
were lower than the default.
I've currently got a dozen or so "help all my money's been stolen" fraud
spam that's scoring at 0.6 :-(
Thanks,
Alex
