Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 > Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before >>>> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the >>>> list-folder :-) >>> >>> Please teach your users to filter on the List-ID: header rather than >>> Subject: for this list. The issue can be entirely avoided without >>> requiring everyone else in the world to alter their behaviour >> >> the [SPAM] marker comes *before* all other sieve-filters >> otherwise it would not catch faked From-Headers >> >> it's not a big deal but i see that mistake sometimes >> also in business communication - not real good > > I do not see any subject lines in this thread with [SPAM] in them. I > rarely see them in this list at all. (I suspect people are aware it can > cause some poorer filtering implementations to delete them.)
so what - this was a new thread to not hijack others > Perhaps you need to look closer to home for this problem? for sure not if it appears in the middle of subjects > Meantime, it is highly recommended that, if someone subscribes to a > list about spam, one MUST make an exception to their filtering rules as > previously mentioned. It's also very sensible. It is ridiculous to > insist that people talking about spam stop using the word "spam" the SA list has a -100 score that won't change the fact that it is in general a bad attitude not look at the subject of a mail someone writes, but so be it until another flamewar starts because some smart asses need to reply to a hint wich needs no repsonse at all and was intended to just point out a common mistake
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
