Am 03.10.2014 um 21:07 schrieb Nick: > Over the last few months, spamassassin has begun barely working for me
spammers also learn > SPAM is so bad that I've actually started training it - which is something > I've never had to do in the past. So I've collected 370+ e-mails over the > last few days, and had sa-learn regularly read in these messages > Training it doesn't seem to have made any impact. if you only train spam samples nothing will happen you need *at least* 200 ham samples to start bayes get used and you really really don't want it any other way because it would kill all your legit mail - the filter needs to know differences and not every single word appeared in the spam-only samples to give a spam score you need to careful floow this: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesInSpamAssassin > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST, > HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, > URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 there is no BAYES tag and so it is not used
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
