Am 14.10.2014 um 15:47 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 03:34 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:On 10/14/2014 02:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 14.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Axb:On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200 Axb wrote:have you verified that some of these are not included? X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help detect ham or spamIt's really no different to other headers you are ignoring.for example, if you get a flood of 419s from the same source, you may want it to be tokenized... or not? or if it only sends ham....but are those IP's not mostly dynamic ones from botnets and so you end in a lot of tokens over the time?OMG... my 4.3GB SCSI2 disk will explode if I have a few (more) pointless tokens...
the question is: are they pointless and if yes why store them
Or it is a good machine that is rooted, and then cleaned up and restored to business by its whitehat admin. But it still is blocked by your self-inflicted 'bayes poison' :)sensibly tuned expiration doesn't permit self inflicted 'bayes poison'
in case of hand maintained bayes that won't happen anyways, that's what "local.cf" is for
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
