Re: Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric

[Reindl Harald]

Am 30.11.2014 um 05:39 schrieb John Hardin:

On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 29.11.2014 um 23:27 schrieb John Hardin:

 However, it is a *warning*, not a fatal error. And it's better than the
 rule killing lint and blocking sa-update completely on an install that
 uses an older perl

don't get me wrong but this *warning* triggers cron mails and spits
messages in case of every SA related command - that's unacceptable and
in fact worser than without that check

before *only* outdated perl versions where affected, now it hits also
recent Fedora setups working before without any warning and with that
rule included

As I said, I underestimated the reaction to doing that.

if that rule can't work in most environments and not made
conditionally it has to be dropped at all because it has more
drawbacks than benefits

It has already been commented out in my sandbox.

But this effectively means we cannot add new features to SA conditionals
because they might do this to older installs

which new features?
which newer perl?

spamassassin-3.4.0-7.fc20.x86_64
perl-5.18.4-291.fc20.x86_64

that "fix" for older versions is just broken and leads to warnings on a recent SA with a recent perl while as first people with outdated setups complained all was fine here

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature