On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Dave Pooser <dave...@pooserville.com> wrote:

> On 12/4/14, 3:10 PM, "Philip Prindeville"
> <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
> 
>> Not necessarily.  If I post to a list with this address, and wait 60
>> days, I can assume that 99.999% of email that comes back after that date
>> is not related to the original posting.
>> 
>> Further, after 15 days, anything which doesn't also copy the list is
>> almost certainly Spam.
> 
> Eh, if I'm researching an odd bug, for instance, and find a 2-year old
> post from someone who had the same problem but don't see any resolution
> posted, I'll probably ping the OP offlist with a "Hey, did you ever find
> the fix for that problem $FOO you were having?" since I can't assume
> they're still subscribed to the list. I may or may not copy the list on
> that email, though I certainly will if I come up with an answer.
> 
> <obligatory http://xkcd.com/979/ reference here>

I’ll have to remember to make the posting sufficiently uninteresting to be 
remembered for any significant length of time.  ;-)

-Philip


Reply via email to