On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:12:47 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >On 12/19/2014 12:28 PM, Dharma Monie wrote: > >>The rule is shipped with SA by default, > >>regarding if it?s enabled by default - checking against that exact > >>uribl - I?m affraid I can?t provide you with a satisfying answer > >>there, as I was not the initial admin configuring ?this? file. > > On 19.12.14 12:36, Axb wrote: > >what .cf file is that in? > >atm, it's *NOT* in the default SA rules. > > it may have been some ~8 years ago, before sbl-xbl became obsoleted by > zen.spamhaus.org. That was before SA 3.2.0 was released.
It wasn't exactly obsoleted, they used to recommend it for web-forms etc, and it still seems to work. The URIBL_SBLXBL rule is given as an example in the documentation for URIDNSBL.pm
