On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.01.2015 um 10:18 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 28.01.15 01:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var
> can't be mounted read-only?
I do not agree. The whole point of /var is to contain varying data and
mounting it read-only defeats the whole purpose of /var.
i am not talking about a own partition
i am talking about a *systemd namespace* and the intention *not* have
anything below /var writeable for a network facing service
"no reason /var can't be mounted read-only" does *not* suggest that.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political Correctness is a doctrine which is based on the premise
that it is possible, through nothing more than a suitable choice
of words, to pick up a turd by the clean end.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until the 12th anniversary of the loss of STS-107 Columbia
