An email from the New York times daily headlines service is hitting Bayes_99
and Bayes_999
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
4.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VERIFIED No description available.
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
3.0 DCC_CHECK Detected as bulk mail by DCC (dcc-servers.net)
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
I’m curious about the two bayes hits and also the 3 points for bulk mail for
something that I can’t see anyone would consider to be actual spam. Oh, and why
is babes_999 so low scoring?
Here are the headers:
X-Envelope-From: <bou...@ms3.lga2.nytimes.com>
X-Envelope-To: <*munged*>
Received: from pmta01.sea1.nytimes.com (unknown)
by mail.covisp.net(Postfix 2.11.3/8.13.0) with SMTP id unknown;
Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:49:50 -0700
(envelope-from <bou...@ms3.lga2.nytimes.com>)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=paperboy-1024;
d=nytimes.com;
h=From:Reply-To:Date:To:Subject:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-version;
i=nytdir...@nytimes.com;
bh=QBBvEngh4H4VJh+esN1V9ZXrEvM=;
b=nEM/BXRsjVQS6eg8IbBlkoGyDkkvdum/HTeAHs23BWniftrODk69nY1G7aD/hyiSZ8Mt1mfugICd
46Eo90oUmNPbl+PZG7gWQgJBu3Gzpy81GXM/WP/IiUe+rJAu3niemR2PLCHbAgB89JsfmuEM5cz4
MvOqLffdWt61lyniYcA=
Received: by pmta01.sea1.nytimes.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r3) id hqcubs0hstka for
<*munged*>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 04:48:51 -0500 (envelope-from
<bou...@ms3.lga2.nytimes.com>)
X-SegmentId: 68668
X-CampaignId: 129
X-InstanceId: 53489
X-ClientId: 34527544
From: NYTimes.com <nytdir...@nytimes.com>
Reply-To: nytdir...@nytimes.com
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:48:51 -0500
To: *munged*
X-job: TH-20150205
Subject: Today's Headlines: Claims Against Saudis Cast New Light on Secret
Pages of 9/11 Report
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:nyt_unsubscr...@lga2.nytimes.com?subject=http://www.nytimes.com/gst/unsub.html?email=*munged*&id=34527544&segment=68668&group=nl&product=TH>,
<http://www.nytimes.com/gst/unsub.html?email=*munged*&id=34527544&segment=68668&group=nl&product=TH>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-version: 1.0
--
'Listen,' said Rincewind. 'It's all over, do you see? You can't put the
spells back in the book, you can't unsay what's been said, you can't-'
'You can try!' --The Light Fantastic
