On 3/5/2015 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
according to spamc --help "-R" and "--full" is the same
in fact in case of a ham-message only -R works as expected
--full behaves identical zu --full-spam
-r, --full-spam Print full report for messages identified as spam.
-R, --full Print full report for all messages.
____________________________
BROKEN: /usr/bin/spamc --full --port=10029 < sample.eml
OK: /usr/bin/spamc R --port=10029 < sample.eml
The spamc code seems to concur -R and --full are the same option:
{ "full", no_argument, 0, 'R' }
Looking in the code, nothing jumps out as a logic issue but testing on
my command line with ham shows problems
spamc -R -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1
<Incorrectly starts with the score/threshold which could just be a
documentation issue and then the report>
spamc --full -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1
<prints nothing. I would expect it to do the same as -R>
Testing on my command line spam:
spamc -r -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/2
spamc --full -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/2
<Identical output of just the report>
The code for R sets flags |= SPAMC_REPORT;
Please open a bugzilla report.
Regards,
KAM
