On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, [email protected] wrote:
Here's would be type examples:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
....and on and on.
I've looked up some of the domains used which are not as obvious as my examples
and they don't exist. The IPs may be OK and don't want to use IPs to snag those.
Again, not much constants in the bodies to do much good to use "HB ??" in the
recipe to look in the header and body.
Well, the basic /\.in\.net/ RE is likely to be rather FP-prone, especially
in Procmail if you aren't using weighting.
There are ways to bound that RE to limit what it will match, but different
parts of the message will need different bounds.
Untested:
* ^Received: .*from [^ ]*\.in\.net[ ]
* ^From: .*\.in\.net[>$]
* ^Return-Path: .*\.in\.net>
* ^Message-ID: .*\.in\.net>
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
A good high-school education is still essential, and
college is where you go to get one. -- MiddleAgedKen
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until the 239th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence