The URIBL_PH_SURBL is actually not very useful.  I have checked a real
phishing site with SURBL and it shows clean in SURBL - I think, SURBL only
looks at the part of the domain.

-----Original Message-----
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: 11 August 2015 12:57
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Phishtank and SpamAssassin

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:11:56 +0000
Sujit Acharyya-choudhury wrote:

> I have seen lot of Phishes submitted in Phishtank.com and yet there
> is no rule to check Phishtank.com. 

There is via URIBL_PH_SURBL. It doesn't score much though.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to