Am 23.11.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Matthias Apitz:
El día Monday, November 23, 2015 a las 10:23:26AM +0200, Jari Fredriksson escribió:This is exactly what I said in my first mail: the description of RDNS_NONE is just wrong; nearly all my incoming mails are flagged by RDNS_NONE; for example the mail I'm right now replying to which came from apache.org says this when I run it through 'spamassassin -D': $ spamassassin -tD < /tmp/apache > /tmp/apache.o 2> /tmp/apache.d $ fgrep RDNS_NONE /tmp/apache.d nov 23 07:46:38.098 [1927] dbg: rules: ran header rule __RDNS_NONE ======> got hit: "[ ip=140.211.11.3 rdns= " nov 23 07:46:39.203 [1927] dbg: check: tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RDNS_NONE and 140.211.11.3 has a rDNS: $ host 140.211.11.3 3.11.211.140.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer hermes.apache.org.Blah. That is NOT normal.What do you want to say exactly with 'Blah. That is NOT normal.'?
likely that it's not normal "nearly all my incoming mails are flagged by RDNS_NONE" nor that this list-messages get flagged
cat maillog | grep RDNS_NONE | wc -l 169 cat maillog | grep "spamd: result" | wc -l 45920Nov 23 10:14:19 mail-gw spamd[20141]: spamd: result: . -102 - CUST_DNSWL_10,CUST_DNSWL_8,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,SHORTCIRCUIT,SHORTCIRCUIT_NET_HAM,USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST scantime=0.2,size=92304,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.5,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=/run/spamassassin/spamassassin.sock,mid=<5652d8dec828b_e3c57c38c8651...@hermes-10.mail>,autolearn=disabled,shortcircuit=ham
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
