On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:37:33 -0800 jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote: > This observation invites a heretical question. Is nearly perfect spam > classification dangerous compared to merely 99.9%/0.1% accurate > classification?
I think it's meaningless to talk about classifications better than 99.9%/0.1% because I do not believe human beings will agree on what's spam vs ham at that level of agreement. Regards, Dianne.
