Re: FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 fires on wrong header

[Reindl Harald]

Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:

On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:

not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear ham
and is broken by definition looking at *random* headers?

cat maillog | grep FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 | grep "result: Y" | wc -l
21

cat maillog | grep FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 | wc -l
130

cat maillog | grep FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 | grep BAYES_00 | wc -l
93

excuse me, did you get a FP?
Together with BAYES_00?

yet talked with another sysadmin

excuse but the point of a rule hit is not "did it end in a complete FP" but "if the rule bahvior is reasonable and hits more spam than ham" same numbers, all spam-hits between 10-36, so without the rule a sure mitler-reject and most hits where clear ham, a few only rescued with BAYES_00 and otherwise tagged

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature