maybe you learn about SPF then...... Am 01.02.2016 um 16:23 schrieb Thomas Barth:
The Mails with docs attached are getting rejected successfully. I m getting a lot of these mails from a botnet now, each mail with a different generated mail suffix, but always with our top level domain. I hope that we dont get problems that the spammers are using our main domain for spreading their spam :-/
[harry@rh:~]$ dig TXT txbweb.de ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P3-RedHat-9.10.3-10.P3.fc23 <<>> TXT txbweb.de ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 13842 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1024 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;txbweb.de. IN TXT ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:txbweb.de. 120 IN SOA dns1.kontent.com. hostmaster.kontent.com. 2015050806 10800 3600 604800 86400
;; Query time: 115 msec ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.6#53(10.0.0.6) ;; WHEN: Mo Feb 01 16:24:56 CET 2016 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 101
Am 01.02.2016 um 15:09 schrieb Reindl Harald:Am 01.02.2016 um 15:05 schrieb Thomas Barth:No viruses were found. Banned name: .exe,.exe-ms,23676883772984656662(1).doc.exe Content type: Banned Not quarantined. The message WAS NOT relayed to: xxx 554 5.7.0 Reject, id=09201-09 - BANNED: .exe,.exe-ms,23676883772984656662(1).doc.exe This message is a test result of ClamAV? I would like to add .doc as banned namesounds like amavis and as already suggested: reject it at smtpd level mime_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/mime_header_checks.cf [root@mail-gw:~]$ cat /etc/postfix/mime_header_checks.cf # Reject Attachment Extensions /^Content-(?:Disposition|Type):(?:.*?;)? \s*(?:file)?name \s* = \s*"?(.*?(\.|=2E)(386|acm|ade|adp|apk|awx|ax|bas|bat|bin|cdf|chm|class|cmd|cnv|com|cpl|crt|csh|dll|dlo|drv|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|jar|jse|lnk|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ocx|ops|pcd|pif|pl|prf|rar|reg|scf|scr|script|sct|sh|shb|shm|shs|so|sys|tlb|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wiz|wll|wpc|wsc|wsf|wsh))(?:\?=)?"?\s*(;|$)/x REJECT Attachment Blocked (Executables And RAR-Files Not Allowed) "$1"Am 01.02.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Reindl Harald:Am 01.02.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Thomas Barth:for a week or so I get a lot of mails with bills as doc-documents and Spamassassin is actually not able to mark it as spamit is able combined BAYES scores and other rules on a proper trained SA leads to 99.9% milter-reject rate of these malware mails here
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature