Am 17.02.2016 um 17:49 schrieb Alex:
http://pastebin.com/zKWUUQ0Q
Obviously they're coming in advance of being on an RBL or DNSBL.
I was thinking to correlate the body text somehow with something that
checks to see if it actually passed through Google (SPF, etc?), but
that won't work for messages that were forwarded to another user...
On 17.02.16 20:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, and that's why bayes-autoexpire is nonsense, your pastebin
would have been rejected here by exceed 8.0 points (milter-rejcts
score) easily
but only if you manually bump scores, which most of people should not.
It also does in no way indicate that bayes autoexpire is nonsense, it only
says it's better to use BAYES (and to have it properly cofigured)
Content analysis details: (13.1 points, 5.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
7.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.4 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
2.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.5 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.2 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1 HTML is very short with a linked image
0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
score HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1 2.215 0.139 0.480 0.001
score RDNS_NONE 2.399 1.274 1.228 0.793
score HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 1.381 1.629 1.400 2.059
score HTML_MESSAGE 0.001
score BAYES_99 0 0 3.8 3.5
score BAYES_999 0 0 0.2 0.2
this would give us lower scores: 5.996 3.043 7.109 6.554
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
