On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, RW wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
MIME_NO_TEXT is a *very* simple rule: "has a content-type:
multipart/* header in the main message headers" and "has no
content-type: text/* MIME header anywhere."
I've only 3 hits on this in the last 4k spam, but FWIW all of them
are due to the CT missing the subtype plain. This is a significant
RFC violation; it might be worth creating a separate, general
MISSING_SUBTYPE rule and adding it as an exclusion to MIME_NO_TEXT.
I don't follow what you're saying, can you provide an example?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
USMC Rules of Gunfighting #6: If you can choose what to bring to a
gunfight, bring a long gun and a friend with a long gun.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: April Fools' day
