Am 04.04.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 21:01 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 03.04.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Martin Gregorie:None of these file extensions appear in my dangerous attachments rule. Maybe .DOC should be included, but it isn't and I simply don't remember if MSWord supported macros back then (2004)MS word supports macros for more than a decade with OOXML they got wiser and made a difference between extensions supporting macros and safe documents, see recent posts of my in the archive, Google or just wikipediaThanks, Reindl I've added .doc to my harmful extensions list
honestly why don't you just switch to a list of non-harmful extensions since there are not much besides .txt given that harmful images in combination with bugs allowed coe execution multiple times, PDF can contain scripts and macros etc.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
