Re: Whitelisting and Expedia/Orbitz

[Reindl Harald]

Am 21.05.2016 um 06:04 schrieb Nick Edwards:

clueless newbie troll
microsofts own attempt at SPF did allow checking in "from"

ididot SPF is defined by the IETF and not by microsoft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_ID != https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net
<mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:

    Am 20.05.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Vincent Fox:

        SPF is only about envelopes?


    yes

        Unless you are Microsoft, who check against the From in the header.


    nonsense

    you likely confuse DMARC with SPF


        ________________________________________
        From: Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net
        <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>>
        Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 10:23:45 AM
        To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
        <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
        Subject: Re: Whitelisting and Expedia/Orbitz

        Am 20.05.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Alex:

            Is it necessary to use the Envelope-From address when
            whitelisting
            with whitelist_from_spf? The docs are unclear as to whether
            I can just
            use the regular From address, which would be easier for me


        SPF is by definition only about envelopes
        however, just use whitelist_auth -> RTFM

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature