Am 02.06.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 12:28 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:Therefore I agree that there could be better way of noticing adminsof a [URIBL_BLOCKED] issue.There's one obvious way of doing this for very little cost & effort: use logwatch. If you're a pukka sysadmin you'll be reading the nightly logwatch report as you drink your first coffee at work, so all that's needed is to create and install a logwatch service that scans /var/log/maillog for lines containing "URIBL_BLOCKED" - this involves a two line config file and a scanner (a few lines of Perl). Then install and forget - add it to the SA package: if URIBL blocks the sysadmin will know about it the next day.
would be a good additionbut i doubt it would help for people which have it in front of their eyes, post it with other questions or even with "here my sa report header, why did this message pass"
that ones hardly have configured their machines in a way that they ever get the logwatch mails or know what logwatch is
the ones which do and know are not the problem
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature