Am 02.06.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 12:28 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:


Therefore I agree that there could be better way of noticing admins
of a [URIBL_BLOCKED] issue.

There's one obvious way of doing this for very little cost & effort:
use logwatch.

If you're a pukka sysadmin you'll be reading the nightly logwatch
report as you drink your first coffee at work, so all that's needed is
to create and install a logwatch service that scans /var/log/maillog
for lines containing "URIBL_BLOCKED" - this involves a two line config
file and a scanner (a few lines of Perl).

Then install and forget - add it to the SA package: if URIBL blocks the
sysadmin will know about it the next day.

would be a good addition

but i doubt it would help for people which have it in front of their eyes, post it with other questions or even with "here my sa report header, why did this message pass"

that ones hardly have configured their machines in a way that they ever get the logwatch mails or know what logwatch is

the ones which do and know are not the problem

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to