I’m trying to discover why T_SPF_TEMPERROR and the other below it are not scoring higher even though they are actually failing?
This is the part from a spam message that is sneaking through. > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on zeus.localhost > X-Spam-Level: * > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, > > HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR,T_SPF_TEMPERROR > autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 > X-Spam-HAM-Report: > * 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) > * 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) > * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% > * [score: 0.4909] > * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily > * valid > * 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with > * dynamic-looking rDNS > * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid > Received: from sd-88929.dedibox.fr (163-172-19-195.rev.poneytelecom.eu > [163.172.19.195]) In local.cf I have > local.cf:score SPF_FAIL 2 > local.cf:score SPF_HELO_FAIL 2 > local.cf:score SPF_SOFTFAIL 2 > local.cf:score T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR 2 > local.cf:score T_SPF_TEMPERROR 2 I’m running with Postfix and Amavisd as well. Everything is working - except something I”ve not configured correctly in this area. Does anyone have any idea why this might be thanks Robert Chalmers
