Thanks for the replies guys So in essence, there is no user friendly method as there were before.
On 09/06/2016 14:19, Joe Quinn wrote: > I have a bookmark in Firefox that points to > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%s&srcpath=&g=Change which is the > status page for the nightly rule updates and is likely what you are > looking for. > > I give it a keyword too, so I can type "ruleqa RULENAME" and it will > replace the "%s" with whatever I type. As for looking up and search those nightly listings, its true I can find an individual rule, but then I cant exactly see how to drill in to it and see its expression or detail - I can only see a load of links showing how effective it is in tests (its not really what I was looking for). Am I missing something? REGEXP: I dont mind having a go at reading them (I have written some myself) but, as you know, even though some are easy and obvious sometimes it can be like reading music - a blur of blobs, dots and squiggles that take a lot of deciphering. Of course, many of them rely on 'functionality' of the plugins (which I cant say I would fully understand) and the understanding of a RULE structure (some are easy and obvious, some are very convoluted). (I recently developed this one from scratch: Its an RFC2822 email address validator: ^(?=.{1,64}@)("[^<>@\\]+"|(?!\.|.*\.(\.|@))[^<> @\\"]+)@(\[(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\]|\[IPv6:(?:[A-Fa-f\d]{1,4}:){7}[A-Fa-f\d]{1,4}\]|(?=.{1,255}$)((?!-|\.|\d+($|\.))[a-zA-Z\d-]{0,62}[a-zA-Z\d])(|\.(?!-|\.|\d+($|\.))[a-zA-Z\d-]{0,62}[a-zA-Z\d]){1,126})$ Very proud of it too. ) -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Where-to-find-DETAIL-for-spamassassin-default-RULES-tp121218p121250.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
