Re: local uribl is not called

[Reindl Harald]

Am 13.06.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Axb:

On 06/13/2016 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:

* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don't show any call

uridnsbl   URIBL_LOCAL  uribl.thelounge.net.  A
body       URIBL_LOCAL  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL')
describe   URIBL_LOCAL  Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
score      URIBL_LOCAL  0.1
tflags     URIBL_LOCAL  net domains_only
____________________________________________

HA! take a look into list and first thing you find is the moaner needing
help coz he so smart he looks at ANCIENT /3.2.x/doc instead of

would you be so much smarter than me you would at least look into your link-target *before* post since then you had a chance to fix it before talking about smart so nobody seens that it's a incompatible change and nobody cared to fix the docs

https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html

quoted from full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html

 uridnsbl        URIBL_SBLXBL    sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.   TXT
 body            URIBL_SBLXBL    eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL')
 describe        URIBL_SBLXBL    Contains a URL listed in the SBL/XBL

says also "uridnsbl" so fix it or at least *read* what you are linking before play smartass instead become abusive

use

urirhsbl BLAH uribl.thelounge.net. A
or
urirhssub BLAH uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2

instead of
uridnsbl

so no "as said the syntax seems to be correct" it is NOT

http://uribl.com/usage.shtml


anyways, thanks, now it works

urirhsbl   URIBL_LOCAL  uribl.thelounge.net.  A
body       URIBL_LOCAL  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL')
describe   URIBL_LOCAL  Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
score      URIBL_LOCAL  0.1
tflags     URIBL_LOCAL  net domains_only

so why it's mentioned in the docs you linked (in the hope they are newer than the radnom one i linked to) and "spamassassin --lint" nor "spamassassin -D" nor any logs don't complain and why the change at all when other sites refer to "uridnsbl" scroll down to "Datafeed users have the ability to load the black_nsip.txt zone locally to utilize this rule"

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature