Am 06.07.2016 um 17:40 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 06.07.2016 um 17:35 schrieb John Hardin:On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Paul Stead wrote:On 06/07/16 16:16, John Hardin wrote:Does that cache-min-ttl also affect NXDOMAIN? Is it possible to configure different TTL for NXDOMAIN (relatively low) and positive results (relatively high)?For this cache-max-negative-ttl exists :):) It's obvious I don't use unbound... Reindl, does that approach help?sounds good and at leat i don't get any error by using unbound-1.5.8-2.fc23.x86_64 and the follwoing settings cache-min-ttl: 600 cache-max-ttl: 43200 cache-max-negative-ttl: 100 when it works as expected it should lead in not so often expire heavily used crap domains without take too long for realize new listings and at least makes the problem nit so big as now
sadly it don't work as expected https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360222
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
