On 2016-09-05 20:38, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > Since I have seen other rules in results with the T_ prefix (for example > > T_DKIM_INVALID) I think it must be some kind of convention with an > > accepted meaning. What is this conventional meaning, and how do these > > rules relate to the ones without the T_ prefix? > > T_ is testing - stff which performans questionable for different reaosns > like T_DKIM_INVALID failing randomly and nobody knows why or rules where > nobody is sure about their impact and if it's ok
Ok, thanks! But That still leaves my original problem: >> I want to use RP_MATCHES_RCVD in a meta rule. I thought I'd check >> its definition before I plunged in and wrote any code, so I grepped >> in /usr/share/spamassassin where all the original rules seem to live >> on my system (debian jessie). But all the hits are either for >> __RP_MATCHES_RCVD (which I assume is an internal rule not to be used >> by outsiders) or for T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD. So how is RP_MATCHES_RCVD defined? -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?
