Am 20.09.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Bowie Bailey:

X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.009 tag=2 tag2=6.31 kill=6.31
        tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MESSAGEID_LOCAL=8,
        PYZOR_CHECK=1.985, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.644, RDNS_NONE=1.274]
        autolearn=no autolearn_force=no

The base SA ruleset is optimized to detect spam with a score of 5.0.  If
you raise that score, you will allow more spam to come through.  If you
lower that score, you will see more legitimate messages blocked as
spam.  Make sure you know what you are doing before you change this score.

I read that 5.0 is aggressive and suitable for single user setup, conservative values are 8.0 or 11.0.

required_score n.nn (default: 5)

I ve checked most of the mails recognized as spam. The lowest score was 8.6x so far.

Here is another mail from ...local. It definitely was spam with zip attachment. Common is a sender address with digits. <> -> <>, quarantine: l/spam-lEHVGcheLkyq.gz, Message-ID: <>, mail_id: lEHVGcheLkyq, Hits: 19.118

May be I also should block sender adresses with more than 2 digits in the name?

Reply via email to