On October 18, 2016 2:09:37 AM EDT, Ruga <r...@protonmail.com> wrote: >RFC 2822 and 5322 are in the "Standards Track". >RFC 822 is still the standard.
Interesting, but the example is still RFC-compliant, even with 822. Regards, Dianne.
On October 18, 2016 2:09:37 AM EDT, Ruga <r...@protonmail.com> wrote: >RFC 2822 and 5322 are in the "Standards Track". >RFC 822 is still the standard.
Interesting, but the example is still RFC-compliant, even with 822. Regards, Dianne.