On 05/12/2016 22:38, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, geoff.sa_users_161...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
OK, blindly following your suggestion yielded the following; does it
tell you anything?
Dec 5 22:20:11.805 [30090] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning,
only 0 spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
0 spams. You need to train it with at least 200 ham and 200 spam
messages before it can start analyzing messages.
Are you training at all?
Are you training the right Bayes database?
Does the 'blindly' give you a clue as to my answers? ;)
I'm afraid the answer to the first question is no...
Thinking about it, I don't have access to my emails on the command line
(I don't have root access as it's a maintained VPS) so I'm not sure I'd
be able to if training requires me pointing SA at folders of mail?
Many thanks,
Geoff
