Hi, >> It also hit a secondary RBL for an IP that it shouldn't have, as well >> as bayes00 and hostkarma_bl, totaling 5.044, making it spam. The IP >> that was hit was 52.40.63.1, mta1b3.c1-t.msyscloud.com. >> >> I would have included that initially, but I figured any one phrase >> shouldn't be enough to add more than 50% of the points with one >> rule... > > 50% of 5 points (the default "spam" score) is 2.5 points. This rule meets > your expectation.
Yeah, at the time I wrote that I was thinking it scored 2.8 points, not 1.8, oops. >> Apr 24 20:40:33.583 [7613] dbg: rules: ran body rule LOW_PRICE ======> >> got hit: "Lowest Price" >> This added 1.5 points to an email discussing reservation pricing, >> making it spam. > > That along with everything else made it spam. > > I'm not trying to be difficult, but: what score *should* phishy/spammy > phrases be limited to? No, I'm sorry, these were all from separate emails. Sorry I wasn't more clear with all of this; it was the end of a long day. I don't think phishy/spammy phrases that are also extremely generic, common phrases found in everyday language should alone have a very high score at all. Even 2.8 points for merely the word "xanax" alone, without any other basis for consideration, sounds too high.
