On 07.05.17 - 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: > > Thanks for all the great advice so far. > > > > Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd on my > > testserver. > > > > My current postfix setup is using spampd as proxy and thus any > > opendkim/opendmarc milters won't work in cojunction. > > > > I've been planning to switch to amavis and use it as a milter for > > quite some time now so maybe I should get on with it. > > > > So far it's working quite nice, took some time to get all services > > working together but for now it's running without errors. > > > > Compiling opendmarc against libspf2 makes the opendmarc internal SPF > > checker functional and now the SA SPF checks (triggered by amavis) are > > firing as well. > > I would like to note that SPF can be used without openDMARC, and imho should > work in SA itself. > > Did you (try to) make SPF working on valhalla.nano-srv.net?
It seems that I simply forgot the load the SPF module in my spamassassin config. A few test mails from different servers are now hitting at least the SPF_HELO_PASS rule but nothing else so far. > > > > On 06.05.17 - 22:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > Also, the mail SHOULD hit SPF_* rule, if the SPF plugin is loaded, but > > > there's none. > > > > > > maybe because: > > > > > > May 6 22:19:09.740 [30047] dbg: spf: relayed through one or more trusted > > > relays, cannot use header-based Envelope-From, skipping > > > > > > ... caused by Received: line containing localhost. the OP should set up > > > spf > > > policyd on valhalla.nano-srv.net... > > > > > For now the main problem at receiver's side seems to be missing SPF > > > results. > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > Boost your system's speed by 500% - DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.* --
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
