On Thursday 25 May 2017 at 18:35:34, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have no backgroud about .
About what?
> I am working on product which is mailserver
What sort of mailserver (or, which product)?
> I see a complaint online about a false positive,
>
> 1.FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA: 2.309, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD: 1.63, HTML_MESSAGE: 0.001,
> NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO: 0.823, TOTAL_SCORE: 8.702,autolearn=no
>
> 2. -0.000, BAYES_50: 1.567, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD: 1.63,
> URIBL_BLOCKED: 0.001, CUSTOM_BODY_RULE_NUMBER_715: 0.1, TOTAL_SCORE:
> 3.298,autolearn=no
> X-Spam-Level: ***
>
> Any suggestions, how these could be resolved
You'll need to give us a whole load more information for us to have a clue
about what the "problem" is.
For example:
1. What MTA are you using, and how is SpamAssassin being called?
2. What are the full headers of the "false positive" emails in question?
3. Which version of SpamAssassin are you using?
4. How do you know these are false positives?
5. Which aspect of the spam score is being claimed as the "false positive"?
In the first email it could be the Mozilla MUA or the Yahoo RCVD header - I
guess in the second case it's the Yahoo RCVD header?
6. What score have you omitted to tell us about and why? In the first email
the scores you've shown add up to 4.75, yet the total shown is 8.7; in the
second email there';s clearly something missing before the "-0.000", although
the values of the scores add up this time.
Summary: the more information you give us, the more likely we are to be able
to help, without simply guessing or offering general and dubiously useful
advice.
Antony.
--
Is it venison for dinner again? Oh deer.
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
