On 2017-07-27 13:08, Rupert Gallagher wrote:

> The rfc prescribes (MUST) the use of your public domain in the domain
> part of your mid.

If you mean RFC 5322, this is not true.  Section 3.6.4:

   The message identifier (msg-id) itself MUST be a globally unique
   identifier for a message.  The generator of the message identifier
   MUST guarantee that the msg-id is unique.  There are several
   algorithms that can be used to accomplish this.  Since the msg-id has
   a similar syntax to addr-spec (identical except that quoted strings,
   comments, and folding white space are not allowed), a good method is
   to put the domain name (or a domain literal IP address) of the host
   on which the message identifier was created on the right-hand side of
   the "@" (since domain names and IP addresses are normally unique),
   and put a combination of the current absolute date and time along
   with some other currently unique (perhaps sequential) identifier
   available on the system (for example, a process id number) on the
   left-hand side.  Though other algorithms will work, it is RECOMMENDED
   that the right-hand side contain some domain identifier (either of
   the host itself or otherwise) such that the generator of the message
   identifier can guarantee the uniqueness of the left-hand side within
   the scope of that domain.

Or do you mean some other RFC, which one?

> So the dns tests are just the first in the queue. The dimain must also
> match early in the Reveived list.

Huh?  Even corrected for the obvious typos, this doesn't make sense.
We're talking about the Message-ID here.

> If you fail with it, then you have problems with every rfc-compliant
> smtp server world-wide. This filter is especially useful against
> scripts, spamming programs, and web-based mailers.

You're free to lose any incoming mail you like, including mine :-)
Though apparently you do get my messages, so I am confused about what
your filter actually does.

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
Do obvious transformation on domain to reply privately _only_ on Usenet.

Reply via email to