On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:11 , jes Struck wrote: > > Hej > > > I started to investigate the branching strategies of subversion. to compare > with Git, Mercurial and ClearCase. > These three tools have an opportunity to branch out in a developer branch > from which to deliver the trunk several times, so that such branches may be > seen as developers industry instead of features industry. In Subversion, it > seems that the second time you try to deliver the subversion dispose of any > changes you've ever made any page on this branch >
By "deliver", I presume you mean a reintegrate-merge, like svn merge --reintegrate ^/branches/mydevbranch > > > So that second time i deliver it tries to deliver changes from Both Changeset > A and B > > i would rather have it only took Changeset B? > > is this me that does not now how the correct way is to due it? You can "revive" your branch (via the "svn merge --record-only" command) after the first reintegration is committed to trunk (or wherever you copied your developer branch from). This is described in the SVN Book at http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.advanced.html#svn.branchmerge.advanced.reintegratetwice Tip: Your diagram shows only merges _from_ the developer branch. To minimize merge conflicts, merge _to_ your developer branch early and often. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#svn.branchemerge.basicmerging.stayinsync Regards, Steve -- Stephen Butler | Senior Consultant elego Software Solutions GmbH Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25 | 13355 Berlin | Germany tel: +49 30 2345 8696 | mobile: +49 163 25 45 015 fax: +49 30 2345 8695 | http://www.elegosoft.com Geschäftsführer: Olaf Wagner | Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 77719 | USt-IdNr: DE163214194
