Guten Tag Thierry Moreau, am Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014 um 05:11 schrieben Sie:
> Digital signatures require public/private key protections, just shifting > the problem to yet another security challenge. And what's the difference to your proposed solution? You are simply re-inventing signatures without any benefit, in your case the generated hash is your "yet another security challenge" and simply comparable to a private key. But signatures would have the benefit that you only need to protect the one and only private key used to create them, not an amount of hashes or use algorithms which are based on former generated hashes and such stuff. I don't see any benefit, just sign your revision ranges and check them. You would even have much better tool support and wouldn't need to reinvent the wheel. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
