I have only used it for a small number of images, actaully. Also, there's a problem with transferring files larger than 1MB. I have not noticed any lags for ~10 images on a page that is served by this method as compared to putting them on a nearby apache or as static assets.
Cheers, PS On 6/11/06, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks alot Peter! Yes that would definitely save me time. I'm planning to save the images in files and I'd like my service to get dimentions and do some java 2d magic. How well does it perform to store all the images in the DB? On 6/11/06, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And as I said, the main part to change here is the part in getImage where > you get a persisitenceService from some kind of Hibernate manager to > actually read the object referred to in the service HTTP argument. > > Not much to it, really. Please use any or all if you can . > Thanks, > > Henri.
