Jesse, This comment of yours that Wicket, in its current form, is technically inferior doesn't hold water for me. Can you cite concrete reasons why you think so? And when I read your comment that they get beaten up a lot I decided to go goggle and find out what that means and could see that the only bashing on Wicket was based on their abuse of the session but this I read in the link to the article I posted earlier that they are solving this issue by using the hard disk. Sorry, but I like fair discussions.
Emmanuel On 12/20/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would Tapestry be losing any kind of battle because one person wrote an email saying they "recommend" using Wicket? When Wicket is actually technically / some other version of better that I can measure I'll admit it but I'm obviously biased towards Tapestry so my opinions are highly suspect. Good for them for getting some good press. They get beaten up a lot so I think it's good that some positive articles are floating around out there for them. On 12/20/06, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I came across this article > http://www.infoq.com/news/2006/12/wicket-vs-springmvc-and-jsf and thought > probably someone here could comment. Is Tapestry really losing the battle > against Wicket? > > Emmanuel > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
