Hi,
As it turns out, the problem is actually that I've used Apache's
mod_rewrite to transparently eliminate the context part of the path
('/xyz/app.htm' => '/app.htm') and obviously Tapestry uses the context
as part of the cookie's path ...
Is there a way to setup Tapestry so that it will set up the cookie path
without the context (or with an alternate path)? I have other
applications on the same app server, so I still need to keep the apps
in seperate contexts.
I have taken a look in the code and I suppose I could simply hack it
until it works, but obviously I'm hoping that it's possible just using
a config file.
Thanks
Mike Davis
On Thu, 3 May 2007 08:47:10 +0200
Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The problem is that I have a page that I'd like users to be able to
> access with or without a session. This works fine, but calling
> getVisit() on that page returns null whether or not the user
> previously had an accessible visit object. Once a user has been to
> that page, calls to getVisit() from *any other page* also return null,
> again regardless of whether a visit object was previously accessible.
>
> Thanks
> Mike Davis
>
>
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2007 04:50:29 +0300
> "Andreas Andreou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > not, that's not correct... session is not invalidated when clicking
> > on a DirectLink having the stateful flag set to false
> >
> > What exactly is the problem you're facing?
> >
> > On 5/3/07, Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been asked to do some work on a Tapestry 3 application
> > > (unfortunately I can't upgrade it!) and I'm struggling with a
> > > DirectLink/session issue. I would like to allow our users to
> > > access certain pages without session, yet still be able to return
> > > to pages that require a session, without losing any stored state.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to create a Tapestry app that allows a user to do
> > > the following?
> > > - open a page that creates and uses a visit object
> > > - click a DirectLink with the stateful flag set to false
> > > - go back to the first page and use the original visit object
> > > again
> > >
> > > Is it correct to say that once a DirectLink is clicked with the
> > > stateful flag set to false, any session data associated with that
> > > user's session is invalidated?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Mike Davis
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
