在 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:49:05 +0800，Thiago HP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道:
On 12/6/07, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this habit of yours of breaking things you think should be done
differently is bad indeed. It is this habit that had endured sufferings
and
almost an impossible task for anyone trying to migrate from any pre T5
to
T5.
Tapestry 5 doesn't have a final, stable release, so everybody working
with
it cannot take for granted that everything will always be the same. ;)
I heard there is a secret work on T6 that would be almost incompatible
with all previous versions.
he is rumormongering
Please post the source of the statement above.
In http://jroller.com/WarnerOnstine/entry/why_hasn_t_tapestry_been,
Howard
wrote:
*(...) the design of Tapestry 5 was created specifically to make it
possible
to continue adding features without breaking backwards compatibility
going
forward. There will not need to be a Tapestry 6. *
Unless Howard has changed his mind, I don't have any reason to believe
that
Howard is already planning a Tapestry 6 without full backward
compatibility
with T5.
Thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
