On Jan 31, 2008 12:55 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see you point, and it just highlights the fact that .tml files are > allowed at the webapp root level which, itself, is an exception to the > rule. For components, the .tml and .properties file must be bundled > in the same package folder as the .class file. > > For pages, and only pages, we allow the .tml to live in the webapp > root as a convienience for previewing. However, even that is > questionable, as a page that has an activation context will have a > different base URL than one that doesn't, meaning that relative URLs > to images and &etc. will always be somewhat tenuous (and Assets should > be used). Indeed. I was one of the guy who 'spoke against' that changes (put template files into webroot), but since they are there i don't see why .properties files shouldn't be there too. Speaking about previewability i tend to use src/html for that pourpose since, as you said, it's obvious the needs for Assets. Regards -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
