This is a much welcomed improvement.  It's definitely a step in the right
direction.

It'd be nice if the components themselves were further categorized, much
like for T4.  Forms, links, etc.

I'm a big fan of the examples, as well, and look forward to seeing more of
them.  As a guy coming from T4, I would have killed to see an example of
using an "else" with an "if".  I think I spent a solid afternoon on that
because it was so different from the way it'd been done in previous Tapestry
versions.

Another thing that I think would be nice is a cross-ref from the binding
type to a little blurb about it.  E.g., I was looking at TextField and saw
the new "nulls" property.  I had no clue what the "nullfieldstrategy"
binding was and had to fumble around the site a bit until I found its
description.

Hope some of that was helpful.

-- 
Kevin


On 1/31/08 1:58 PM, in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Howard Lewis
Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've been very busy this week improving the Tapestry Component Reference.
> 
> The Component Reference is now generated as multiple pages: an master
> index, and one page per component (or mixin, page, base class) that is
> documented.
> 
> Documentation partly comes from the JavaDoc for the component, and
> partly from an extra hand-tooled documentation file.  The hand-tooled
> documentation gives extra examples and notes.
> 
> You can view the current documentation set here:
> 
> http://tapestry.formos.com/nightly/tapestry5/tapestry-core/ref/index.html
> 
> Feedback is most welcome!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to