Yep, that works perfect... I was after a complex solution when the answer was so simple :o) Thanks...
Josh Canfield wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > I'm not familiar with ICallback, but it sounds like what you are trying to > do matches something I use to keep track of the referring page within my > application. > > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-page-navigation-%28return-to-arbitrary-page%29-p14155874.html > > Essentially you create the Link object and stick it in a @Persist'd > attribute of the page. > > Josh > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Maybe i'm missing something but i'm not seeing an easy way to solve this. >> Well, in it's simplest form i can just pass a page name to the >> activation context of the redirection target page and then use that >> String value to return to the original page. Works fine. >> >> But, a little more complex use case. What if i want to keep the >> activation context from the original page ? >> My first take at this was to instead of passing a String to the >> redirection target page i would pass a Link instance that i would build. >> That doesn't work because Tapestry can't coerce Link objects. >> Second take, i will pass the result of the toURI method of the generated >> Link. Now the problem is, how do i perform de redirect ? The passed >> string isn't a page name so i can't just return it. I can't also seem to >> find a way to build the a new Link object from the given string. >> >> Am i missing something here ? >> >> Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> >>> Yes, the passivate/activate events fill similar roles to ICallback. >>> There is no exact analog, but that's because you can build your own so >>> easily on top of the passivate and activate events. >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2007 5:40 AM, Stephane Decleire >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I'm trying to migrate an application which use ICallback from Tap 4.1.3 >>>> to Tap 5.0.6 >>>> Is there an equivalent to the callback notion in Tap 5 ? >>>> If not, does anybody know a way to implement such a mechanism ? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> Stephane >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > > >
