I agree. I have requested this before for Tapestry to be a full web
framework since right now it's just only a plain web framework.

On 3/19/08, yuan gogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tapestry is good.
> But I personally think it's lack of something that should be built-in.
> e.gsecurity!
>
> It's right that tapestry can work well with acegisecurity, but it's not
> native, is it?
> And we programmer need time to write the configuration, debug ........ it's
> boring!
>
> Even there has been tapestry-acegi, but 2 projects can not be always be
> synchronous. What's more, tapestry-acegi can not do all that acegi does.
>
> I was asp.net user once, even I think it's not so good, but it's good for
> "rapid" development, because some functions like security is built-in.
>
> thanks.
>


-- 
Let's show the world what we've got.

Blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to