Hi, Why not just simply add a page to the Tapestry homepage with arguments for/against tapestry? Everyone who really is interested in informations and differences between * and Tapestry could have a look at and anyone who wants to ignore 'trolls' can do so and/or send the url.
Even a link-list with articles about different frameworks would do. Everyone should be able to pick the best framework for his needs. And every troll perhaps answers questions that can be answered by or added to the page/link list. Last but not least every serious engineer will find arguments for/against tapestry by himself. If he hasn't enough arguments, he should call into question whether Tapestry IS the right framework for what he/she wants to do. A summary page or link-list to articles just could make search/things easier for him. But always he will have to decide himself. Grz Andi -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Daniel Jue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. März 2008 19:08 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: Tapestry at my company I honestly don't know much about Apache Wicket, except that there is a Wicket user who likes to spread lies, misinformation and FUD on the Tapestry Users Group because he feels it is the necessary way to promote Wicket over Tapestry. He is known by many names, such as Emmanuel Sowah, Francis Amanfo, and now Rob Smeets. If you are reaching this message from Google, Nabble, etc, please note that these trolls are the same person trying so desperately to promote Wicket. He is likely to appear with a new name. He kind of reminds me of the Iraqi Minister of (mis-)Information. http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/mss_history.html http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/#quotes I can imagine "Francis" saying, "I can say, and I am responsible for what I am saying, that they have started to commit suicide using CDs of our framework. We will encourage them to commit more suicides quickly. Apache Wicket's framework, it's name be praised, has slaughtered the infidel Tapestry's user base. Even as we speak Wicket is being promoted as the lead framework for IBM. These are simple truths, Tapestry is not worth an old shoe." If the Wicket user base wishes to have a different representative, let a Wicket user come here and denounce the trolling done in Wicket's name. Daniel On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Tomorrow is our last day of debate at my work about which framework to > choose for our upcoming huge project. > Its seems Wicket is winning the race for it's innovativeness, finess and > excellent support, they claim, unfortunately. Most on my team members are > concerned about the radically incompatible versions Tapestry has. And many > say Tapestry 5 is over engineerd and has already lost the webframework > battle and are concerned of it's future, in terms of upgrade and support. > Could someone here offer me some killer arguments to counterfight these FUDs > of my team? > > Regards, > > Rob > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
