PageTester doesn't actually run a servlet container. It sets up the runtime
environment for you so that you can render a page and make assertions on the
rendered DOM. It's much faster than AbstractIntegrationTestSuite but it
doesn't provide as much flexibility.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Angelo Chen <angelochen...@yahoo.com.hk>wrote:
>
> Thanks, how different it is from PageTester?
>
>
> HugoPalma wrote:
> >
> > AbstractIntegrationTestSuite uses selenium for running the tests so most
> > of
> > the API you'll see in it is derived from the selenium API.
> > Here's a simple example that opens the application default URL and sends
> a
> > click action to the browser:
> >
> > public class MyIntegrationTestClass extends AbstractIntegrationTestSuite
> {
> > @Test
> > public void test_some_thing() {
> > open(BASE_URL);
> >
> > clickAndWait("//d...@class='login']/input");
> > }
> > }
> >
> > All you have to do now is run the test and AbstractIntegrationTestSuite
> > will
> > take care of starting the jetty instance and all that stuff for you.
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Angelo Chen
> > <angelochen...@yahoo.com.hk>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm interested in using AbstractIntegrationTestSuite to test some pages,
> >> any
> >> samples on how to use it? I have looked at the T5 source, and not quite
> >> understand them, need only a simple one to get started. thanks,
> >>
> >> Angelo
> >>
> >>
> >> HugoPalma wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm implementing my user interface tests using selenium and the
> >> provided
> >> > AbstractIntegrationTestSuite class. Everything is working fine.
> >> >
> >> > Still, i'd like to replace my DAO services implementation with some
> >> mock
> >> > ones when i run the tests. The problem is that the services are
> >> declared
> >> > in
> >> > the application module so how do i override those declarations for
> >> testing
> >> > purposes ?
> >> > One workaround i found was to pass a VM parameter when i run the test
> >> goal
> >> > and then in the bind method implementation i check for the parameter
> >> and
> >> > declare either the prodution implementation or the mock one. Although
> >> this
> >> > works it forces me to implement the mock objects in the main sources
> >> and
> >> > not
> >> > on the test sources where they should be.
> >> >
> >> > I was wondering if anyone had a better way to do this.
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Providing-service-mocks-for-integration-tests-tp22173123p22180881.html
> >> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Providing-service-mocks-for-integration-tests-tp22173123p22202953.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
