Ben Gidley wrote: > > I don't think using Stax will help. It is not woodstox that breaks app > engine but the stax api itself. > I know - that's what I tried to say in my blog entry.
But my concern was to use plain Stax instead of Woodstox just for the sake of minimizing dependencies and using Java standards. I prefer to rely on standards (if they're there). -- Chris -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Woodstox-dependency-needed--tp2645025p2663210.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
